|
RANJEEV
MENON
Warehousing Specialist
DANZAS AEI Emirates LLC
Dubai
|
|
Accuracy in order picking = Better Customer
Service
|
|
Dec
2002 |
Achievement
of customer satisfaction is the key objective of a distribution
system and indeed of the total supply chain.
Understanding how to identify actual and real customer needs
and to translate this information into deliverable service is
critical to logistics success of any organization.
Order
picking is a critical customer service tool, which, if done well,
will enhance the company’s customer service standards and if badly
executed, will have the opposite effect.
Quality
in order picking means the elimination of errors and the aim in an
efficient operation should be to achieve a 100% accuracy.
To plan for anything less is to accept incorrect customer
orders, lost sales, lost customers and lost profit.
Improving
Order Picking Accuracy
How
often does warehousing operations measure their actual error rate?
The response to this would be very much on the lower side.
Knowing where your errors are occurring and to be aware of
the real cost of an error and the impact this will have on your
service level goals are very important.
An error may be very small in itself but when multiplied by
the number of occurrences it will have great impact on the
profitability.
The
very best way to reduce errors is to not make them in the first
place! One dollar spent
preventing errors should remove the necessity for sixteen dollars
spent on correction. This
reasoning holds true when attempting to reduce errors by improving
the picking methods and techniques. This is not only more cost
effective than rigorous inspection, it is easier to do. This applies
to a case or unit load picking errors, and more directed towards
broken case or individual units type of order selection.
Where
does it go wrong?
There are four types of errors: counting errors, cross picking,
omission – where the item is not picked, and excess picking where
the item is included that was not ordered at all.
The most frequent occurrence would be on cross picking,
followed by counting errors. The
third in frequency is the omission of an entire item and the last on
the list is inclusion of an item not ordered.
top
|
Cross-picks
(product cross-over) |
Counting
Errors |
|
Most frequent error, normally hard to detect with anything
less than 100% item and count check. This is one of the most
complicated and costly errors to correct, as it involves
credit for the missing item, return freight for the
cross-picked item, and the express freight charges for
re-shipping the missing item.
|
Detecting a full case picking error is relatively easy as
the total number of cases is known, and the individual item
count will add up to the total.
In the instance of a split case order, or repacked
shipment, the possibility of an item miscount going
undetected is higher.
This makes checking the split case orders more
important than go through the customer complaints, &
error rectifying costs.
|
|
Error
of omission (shortages) |
Excess
picking
(overages) |
|
Even though not very frequent, but when occurs, the impact
on services levels and the costs attached to repair the
damage are very high. It
is not only costly but affects the company image as well.
|
The error of including items not ordered generates a no win
situation. Human nature being what it is, it is rare for a
customer to point out that you have sent him goods for which
he has not been charged. In this case, you have lost the
pick labor, the merchandise and the freight.
|
top
How
do we rectify the situation?
The
most popular one being checking the picked orders and the other one
is to improve the picking situation.
Checking
The
operational solution to reduce errors is to check the picked orders
and the advantages are; it requires no capital expenditure.
Even though it may cost more in the long run, but the
positive effect is that this will stop the customer complaints,
which in turn will improve the levels of service provided. Morever,
it may influence the care taken in picking, by letting the
order pickers know that their work is being check for accuracy.
This would have a positive impact, as the pickers would be
more careful and vigilant while picking the orders.
Improve
Picking
Another
technique is to modify the picking environment and its control by
some productive efforts as more legible sku labels, a good locator
system and sequenced pick documents.
More radical changes would include mechanized picking
equipment, computer aided order picking or paperless picking.
This would represent a large investment and must be
thoroughly justified in hard dollars and savings. In addition to the
savings due to labor productivity increases and space utilization,
there is a real saving, often overlooked, which is due to the
reduction in errors at the source. It is the evaluation of that
saving or the avoidance of the hidden costs due to errors to which
this article is aimed at.
top
|
Get started …….
The first step is to log the errors detected and corrected. This may be
accomplished by a 100% item and count check. This can be done on a
temporary basis long enough to develop a measure of the error rate
in order selection. The checking operation may then be modified,
dropped or continued, based on the economic trade-off of error cost
versus checking cost. At any rate, a gauge of the error rate is a
necessity in order to reduce the error rate.
|
top
|